- 2015-01-29 at 3:03 PM#18358+2
Please read and consider the following proposition about the evolution of sexual conduct and its influence on sociology–particularly how it keeps men down and empowers women. Feel free to mock me, correct me, advise me and offer your thoughts.
In the 1970’s and 1980’s, the family unit was destroyed because women wanted independence, money and the jobs of men. Marriage and fidelity became a joke as one night stands, sex for recreation (outside of marriage) and divorce, became the norm. Basically all the worst things I shouldn’t have to list that the feminist inflicted on society. Today, you’re about as likely to meet a legitimate virgin (waiting for marriage) as you are to find a unicorn.
I’m tempted to say that everyone has had multiple sexual partners in the double digits by the time they’re 30. Obviously people lie about their number but as a male 30 year old I can say that my number is 15. Multiple women I have dated have admitted numbers north of 80! You may think these are some loose women but to think that the numbers aren’t overall embarrassing these days, for women and men in general, is delusional.
Society has grown severely liberal from an originally very conservative sexual conduct, correct? Its fairly obvious to me that this shift in sexual ethics is the biggest wedge being driven between the sexes. No strings attached sex isn’t doing Men any favors in society. You may think you’re getting a one up with no commitment but so is she, and she already has legal supremacy and cultural supremacy whereas a man doesn’t.
The absolute one thing that women need from men, that they continually try to outsource but keep coming back for, is sex. They already have child support, they have the legal upper hand, they have a mass media misandry machine, they have discounted college, high pay jobs and more freedom than anyone in society. Essentially, they get everything that they want with absolutely no responsibility or accountability attached. Why would YOU, who has none of the favors she has, forfeit sex with no obligation for her? Why would you, who has only one leveraging tool left in the whole world, forfeit the one thing they can’t take from us? The icing on the cake that makes her life her life heaven on Earth.
All you’re doing when you bag chicks for fun is teach them that men have fully submitted to female empowerment. You teach them that sex with any man is free and they don’t have to earn your affection, or respect you, or stay faithful to you. They continually turn this around and play like the victims, like they are the ones needing your security and fidelity but in reality, she wants to treat you like a toy and abandon you with no sense of obligation. So now, not only does she have every conceivable advantage afforded her in society but she can freely go and pick a guy to take home and court–and the best part is that he believes that he just got one over on her! He’s oblivious that she is now invincible and accountable to no one. Free to enjoy the fat of the land in every way, including now, the pleasures of carnal intimacy. What more could women want and why would they ever allow such a perk to disappear?
How you can call yourself a Man Going His Own Way and still engage in behavior that keeps women dominant is beyond me. I think the main reason is that many of my fellow men don’t understand the sociological checkmate that women have us in. We’re work horses to them! To be picked out, bred, f~~~ed and thrown away but many so called MRA’s and MGTOW’s are willing participants. If Going Your Own Way means anything to me, it means understanding a higher game at play that keeps men down and we need to opt out of it in total! Understanding not to participate in behavior that keeps our male stocks cheap and the price for pussy higher and higher.
Stop! Stop! Stop bagging chicks just to get your dick wet. This is the reason women have never changed. They know men are instinctively hypnotized by vagina and that they can use that against us. To bring about real societal change in women, a 10 year MGTOW Abstinence Pledge (if enough men would actually do it) would stop misandry in its tracks and make sense. Cut off the dick supply and raise awareness against the millions of chicks that use men and disrespect our natural role. This is not a movement because it doesn’t require action on your part. It requires inaction.
I’m talking about ignoring them entirely in our personal affairs and never even dating these hoyden cows…date no one! That’s MGTOW! Let them all go struggle to pay male laborers to do all the male professions they cant do or convince men to do for free. Let them go screw themselves with their arsenals of dildos and vibrators. Let them go turn into lesbians and raise effeminate kids that know nothing of what adult males are like. You say you all hate it. I’m not convinced we cant make an impact for our mutual male well-being.
I’ll be the first one because its nothing to me to remain celibate. I haven’t gotten pussy (and I’m not gay) in over a year–whats nine more? There’s nothing a woman can do to me that I can’t do to myself for free and without a lot of hassle. It’s called a 10 minute hot shower, not endless, painful hours of talking her into bed while she just goes out every weekend and mounts another stud with absolutely no hassle–he’ll even buy her drinks!
I Terminal Meme, in Dallas Texas, on this January 29th, 2015, vow to uphold the “10 Year MGTOW Celibacy Pledge” in an effort to replenish the deserving respect, honor, loyalty and fidelity that females have continued to deny men thus far in the 21st century. Feel free to honor your own pledge and begin when you’ve had enough of their bulls~~~.2015-01-30 at 12:09 AM#18479
There have been alot of people discussing your gender recently. So I’ll quote another “bright” member.
My red pill is sometimes just standing behind the 1st amendment. If Terminal Meme is a man then I’m sure he can convince us with a short essay about what its like to own a penis. Lets hear it Terminal, please elegantly describe the sensations and caveats of having a dick and b~~~~ permanently attached to your body. If I had to, I think I could convince fellow men of my gender via this avenue.
You seem to be good with essays so this would be no problem for you.2015-02-02 at 8:56 AM#19401+1
The lack of sexual ethics does noone a favor, men or women. To lump either gender only into a category promotes a “one sex dominates the other” movement which is fundamentally homosexual. Both sexes compliment eachother, however their relationship is corrupted. Men are dropping out in order to “survive”. It is not that men are better than women or that women are better than men.
The purpose of celibacy is not to avoid women but rather to focus ones energy to a specific task or line of work. It is not about avoiding but rather focusing any and everything into one thing. That is why “purity” is always brought up next to it. Purity of intention and act brought about by focus. Sex is about 70% mental. That mental energy is applied elsewhere. Without focus, celibacy is a poorly written joke and is actually a bad thing.
Things are just so f~~~ed up it is becoming a free for all, metaphorically and literally.2015-02-02 at 11:19 AM#19437+2
Celibate 10 years 3 months so far. 4 partners up to that point. The first was my ex-wife; the other 3 were one night stands.
It actually gets easier. If you feel horny just go on Plenty of Fish and read women’s profiles. The entitlement till make you puke. Then go jerk off and thank God you won’t wake up with an STD, a severed penis or a larger credit card balance.2015-02-03 at 2:03 PM#19660
John Doe, Thanks for dropping a line over here.
I agree on the two sexes complimenting each other. I frequently say that they play mutually exclusively roles. One without the other would suffer tremendously since we’ve evolved together. I’d never downplay the extraordinary presence and benefit that women bring to the table as the other half of the species. But my lack of tack, and my emotional hostility towards women make me look misogynist when I try to point out the “corruption” you mentioned.
I don’t quite understand your “one sex dominates the other which is a movement –fundamentally homosexual” comment. Are you using homosexual as an adjective? I “get” that poor sexual ethics do both genders a huge disservice but I think the negative impact on women is negligible while its effect on most men is the crushing and determining blow. I say most since there is a small percentage of men that benefit tremendously from sluts since they’re chosen and the rest are picked last or not at all.
I pretend to understand some sociological aspects but get lost in my own plight and desire. Its tough to account for personal bias. Im not sure if NAWALT is a joke or not. I thought I read somewhere that its meant as sarcasm–that all women really are like that without exception (which to some degree is definitely true whether shes your best friend, sister or mother). Here and there I meet a seemingly close NAWALT. I know a woman who isn’t quite NAWALT but she’s not a player. Divorced, 37 years old, only 8 previous sexual partners. Its not ‘one’ or ‘zero’ but it’s a clear marker that she isn’t a total hoe. After knowing her 3 years I can say I believe her. Unfortunately she is dumb as a rock, identifies as Christian Liberal, votes Democratic in total, and is a radio for the usual feminist cliches. She isn’t a fundamental feminazi ranting about patriarchy but if questioned–dumb sentences start to come out of her mouth. A woman like this is basically the closest I’ve seen to tolerable. I’ve never met a NAWALT to be sure.
My saved energy from celibacy is spent on fine art–oil paintings to be precise. Its a lost pastime, un-respected, un-lucrative in every way, but it’s a passion and it brings immense joy that isn’t dependent on anyone. Good points, you had on the whole point of celibacy–perhaps I’ll void my pledge if this woman wants to use me for sex the next time she is buzzed on cider at my house.
I can’t help but think though, if women were playing the roles they were meant to play in society instead of philandering around pretending to be bossy top exec’s and blowing money on cars, jewelry, clothes, drinks etc… If they weren’t zombified by misandric memes from infancy onward (I think you know what I’m talking about) If they weren’t busy on ridiculous vendettas against the church about delusions of equality (Many feminists are atheist for all the wrong reasons. Atheism is reasonable but the fems just care about furthering their war on men, not about correcting anthropomorphic delusion in the masses) If they weren’t busy raising the newest (and 2nd) effeminate, fatherless and homosexually prone generation (It’s my sincere opinion that bisexuality and homosexuality would not have flourished and spread to this degree if it had not been for feminists–there is a gross abundance of pseudo scientific lies, malingering, and plain delusion surrounding the gay movement)…..if women weren’t corrupted by all that s~~~ then I’d be able to go down to the local hang out, get to know people and without any care in the world, fall in love, get married, have kids and be happy. Instead, I have to cut myself off before I can even fall in love because women have abandoned their role as wives and mothers. They abandoned it to try and disprove their naturally inferior status. They abandoned it for cash and accuse others of greed. They evaded responsibility and now we’re paying dearly, decades later. I can’t submit to love because of credible fear of abandonment, sabotage and infidelity. MGTOW appeals to all men, those who’ve been through the ringer, escaped just before the ringer or who might yet fall into the ringer.
To me, today, looking at their towering empire that’s now recruited men too (gays) they are unstoppable. The only tool we have left is MGTOW. My celibacy is just my dignity in the face of a massive set up designed to keep me in servitude. I’m not some chicks sex toy to be had once in a while. My self respect is too great to be humiliated.
Thanks for reading.2015-02-03 at 2:26 PM#19667
A slut is a slut. Some are more skilled at it than others. She claims 8 but it is probably closer to 15+. I observed a statistic one time that showed a woman’s commitment to her partner drops by 46% after her second partner. It is in the low 20s or 30s by eight, if I am correct. You also have to remember that women are a vessel for their culture, and she is Western.
Stay away from the woman and focus on the art. Her beauty will pass quicker than the painting’s will.2015-02-03 at 5:53 PM#19702
I feel about females the way I feel about fine dining.
I don’t have a problem with going out someplace fancy and ordering the steak and lobster and a glass of expensive red wine now and then… and I don’t even have a problem with paying the restaurant’s asking price for them, so long as they’re properly prepared and served. But I am not going to eat at Fleur de Lys or Picasso every day and I am DEFINITELY not going to invest in a restaurant.
I am quite happy to cook at home for the most part and I’m not above ordering a pizza or picking up a burger at my local fast food joint from time to time. When I do go out for fine dining, though, I know exactly what I want and exactly what I’m getting into. Home cooking and junk food can sustain my life but a four star meal once in a while really stands out in the memory (not to mention that it improves the quality of my home cooking… if you know what I mean).
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.