9/11 .Truth.

Topic by Hitman

K

Home Forums MGTOW Central 9/11 .Truth.

This topic contains 80 replies, has 19 voices, and was last updated by  Hitman 3 years, 5 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 73 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #248671
    +3

    Anonymous
    37

    processed concrete was used as a base and never covered.

    any way to cover that s~~~ up ?
    salt spreader filled with some kind of sand/ asphalt mix / …
    something cheap but that will seal up the dust..
    excess roofing tar / with soil /
    i dunno ..
    just throwing out ideas..

    The one thing I like about this place? Ya have to f~~~ a goat and post it before your considered as “going over the line”.

    Hey Hitman, Calcium chloride keeps the dust down by attracting and holding moisture. I have 250 gallons of cold tar in 5 gallon buckets (brand new free on CL) that I intend to mix with motoroil and make a sprayer to trap the dust.

    Hate to pop your bubble guys, but nothing is going to make America great again, it has terminal cancer and is dying. There will be a new world order and dust munching for everyone.

    I don’t think I can handle the elections here when they roll around, they mean nothing to people that have been rolled over and pressed under. I won’t be happy until DC is a radio active parking lot. I wouldn’t mind being sprinkled with a little Obama dust to cover these roads. What’s a little more dust for the people already choking on dust?

    There’s no shame in having condemned family campgrounds vacated and void of people, not like here where the people are surrounded and disbanded from societies amenities by SCREW process of the law. The only functioning branch of government here are the tax collectors, their revenue is PROOF there is taxation without representation.

    In the MG-Tower dictionary the definition of America can be found in the pages marked fraud. You can’t hide 280 acres of tyrannical despotic rule. Imagine the s~~~ you can’t see that they brush under their filthy carpet.

    The tyrannical molestation I’ve endured here over the past 42 years has given me the strength and fortitude to walk past the burned and suffering and to spit on them for the relief they desire. It made me truly heartless and has given me more than the ability for just cold blooded murder.

    #248722
    +1

    Anonymous
    10

    The buildings went down, no doubt. One of my cousins was on a tug that pushed a barge from down here to up there and witnessed the whole thing live himself plus on my own flying trips into Newark one could not help but notice the gaps in The City’s skyline.

    The government knew about the plot being fomented and used it to further the NWO cause. Supposedly, they were advised about those goat f~~~ers in that Florida flight school wanting to learn to fly but not very interested in learning how to land. I love flying, but feeling those wheels touch the runway is always a relief kind of like landing on a beach after paddling back from 3 miles offshore.

    WTC7 and The Patriot act being conveniently rolled out so quickly were quite fishy to me.

    All I know is that the feral government does not give a flying rat’s ass about the average American or anyone else in the World that is not an oligarch.

    #248726
    +1
    Russky
    Russky
    Participant
    13502

    Well, see, the problem with imploding buildings is that you need weeks to wire it, not 6 hours.

    Actually the implosion argument is not a good one. Buildings like the WTC are designed to “implode” in the event of catastrophic structural failure because dropping straight down into themselves is infinitely preferable to toppling over sideways like a giant domino.

    Regardless of what you think caused the catastrophic structural failure, the towers themselves behaved exactly as they were originally designed to do. So while it does take weeks to plan out an implosion, in the case of the WTC those weeks were spent back in the 1960s, years before the foundations were even dug.

    Wow, that’s even crazier conspiracy theory than lizards from outer space. Are you saying all skyscrapers come pre-wired with explosives in case they need to be brought down?

    proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

    #248729
    +2
    Rennie
    Rennie
    Participant

    in the case of the WTC those weeks were spent back in the 1960s, years before the foundations were even dug.

    Supposedly the kind of explosives involved in such a demolition have to be used within a month or two, or they degrade and become useless.

    #248777
    +1
    K
    Hitman
    Participant

    i believe that a few weeks prior to 9/11 the buildings were closed for a day for “renovation ” by a few teams of “designers”.
    perfect chance to wire the whole thing up.
    thank you all for the replies..
    redpillbible’s pics were hilarious !
    you guys know as well as i do that it was real and the buildings fell.
    how was not my point.
    just to put it out there that people actually believe it never happened.
    i have a friend who was there too,
    retired now ,
    and a whack-job where he works was saying it never happened at all.
    and a note………..
    that day film was taken of muslim community residents in new jersey DANCING and CHEERING as the towers fell.
    Trump got flack for saying he saw that on t.v but I DID TOO !

    God Bless America ! we need it !!!

    #248781
    +1
    Russky
    Russky
    Participant
    13502

    in the case of the WTC those weeks were spent back in the 1960s, years before the foundations were even dug.

    Supposedly the kind of explosives involved in such a demolition have to be used within a month or two, or they degrade and become useless.

    Re-reading his post, I think he suggests the blueprints themselves were designed in such a way, so buildings would structurally fail in symmetry. I don’t even know how to respond

    proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

    #248783
    +1
    Bee
    Bee
    Participant
    700

    Jet fuel is not hot enough to melt steel nor does it burn for months, but thermite does.

    #248833
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28789

    I watched the second plane hit the tower on a big screen TV.

    It happened, the details are still open IMHO.

    I’m kinda meh on Isreal but when I saw the video of the Palestinian filth dancing with joy that maybe upto 100k human beings had been killed, I wanted to buy a case of bullets for the Isreal army.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #248856
    Anonymousyam
    anonymousyam
    Participant
    4605

    I watched the second plane hit the tower on a big screen TV.

    It happened, the details are still open IMHO.

    I’m kinda meh on Isreal but when I saw the video of the Palestinian filth dancing with joy that maybe upto 100k human beings had been killed, I wanted to buy a case of bullets for the Isreal army.

    I can actually see why they did that since america is israel’s bitch.

    Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

    #248871
    CPT Obvious
    CPT Obvious
    Participant
    2155
    #248872
    +1
    Russky
    Russky
    Participant
    13502

    I am tired of the mantra that jet fuel can’t melt steel as proof of a conspiracy.

    From From Jefferson Lab and melting temp of steel>

    Addendum (8/26/2011): I answered this question many years ago and it has been referenced in many different web sites and reports. There has been one misrepresentation that has come from that. Many sites refer to the difference in the melting point of steel and the burning temperature of jet fuel as proof that the World Trade Center could not have fallen from the aircraft fires. What those authors fail to note is that while steel melts at around 1,370°C (2500°F) it begins to lose its strength at a much lower temperature. The steel structure of the World Trade Center would not have to melt in order for the buildings to lose their structural integrity. Steel can be soft at 538°C (1,000°F) well below the burning temperature of jet fuel.

    For example, I have several 4 foot long, steel hot dog roasters I use while camping. They are fairly heavy duty with thick wooden handles. After roasting some marshmallows, I left one resting on a rock suspended over the campfire to burn off the residue. I forgot about it for a while, then noticed it was starting to glow red and sag a little.

    My campfire is not hot enough to melt steel either, but it was hot enough to affect the integrity visibly.

    Kerosene (jet fuel) fire only lasted 1-2 seconds during the initial blast. It was gone after that. The only stuff that remained burning – was office furniture and stuff.
    Jet fuel argument is a s~~~ty one, because it a strawman, like I said – jet fuel couldn’t melt steel or soften it because all of it exploded during the impact

    proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

    #248885
    +1
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35354

    Are you saying all skyscrapers come pre-wired with explosives in case they need to be brought down?

    Supposedly the kind of explosives involved in such a demolition have to be used within a month or two, or they degrade and become useless.

    No explosives are needed. With enough time and a hacksaw you could bring one of these building down. It would take a f~~~load lot of time, and you would be bringing it down upon yourself, but when it eventually comes down it will drop straight down into itself. Just like it was designed to do.

    Oh, and for the record, you don’t have to melt the steel framing of a building to bring it down. You just need to bring enough framing members near enough to their plastic deformation temperature that the load on them causes them to yield. I don’t know what yield temperature the WTC towers were rated at, but for some buildings this can be as low as 500C, which is pretty damn low. I mean your average boy scout marshmallow campfire is at least 800C at the center. If it’s a liquid fueled fire where the fuel is splashed onto the steel the effect is magnified because the heat gets transferred directly into the metal.

    Honestly, if you have the time and you know what you’re doing it’s disturbingly easy to bring down a modern skyscraper. Slamming a fully fueled commercial jet into one is total amateur hour bulls~~~, but despite what people claim is actually more than enough to do the job.

    #248889
    +1
    Russky
    Russky
    Participant
    13502

    @sidecar – watch the video of building 7 I posted above and tell me with a straight face it wasn’t demolished using explosives
    again – no planes hit it, there was no jet fuel, and nobody used hacksaws on it. It just fell to the ground for no apparent reason

    proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

    #248895
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35354

    @sidecar – watch the video of building 7 I posted above and tell me with a straight face it wasn’t demolished using explosives
    again

    I learned long ago not to trust any video footage found on the internet without extreme corroboration. Next you’ll be telling us bigfoot is real.

    While that does look like a controlled demolition, that is not one of the old WTC towers. It doesn’t look anything like them.

    And on closer inspection, it doesn’t even look like a controlled demolition. What it actually looks like are tempered glass panels failing as the outer curtain of the building buckles immediately prior to its collapse. Haven’t you ever seen tempered glass fail?

    Seriously, why would you fall for such an obvious hoax?

    – no planes hit it, there was no jet fuel, and nobody used hacksaws on it. It just fell to the ground for no apparent reason

    N~~~~~ I f~~~ing saw the second plane hit with my own f~~~ing eyes so don’t be f~~~ing telling me that “no planes hit it” s~~~. I was f~~~ing there.

    #248901
    +1
    Killmandrill
    Killmandrill
    Participant
    497

    When you smash a 125 ton (metric) airplane into a building at ~ 950 km/h or 593 mph and providing that the plane pierced half way into the building and the steel construction in the area of the impact got weak through heat, would´nt the part of the building that was atop of the damage tipped to this side, into that direction of the damage and fallen that way?

    Or would it have perfectly fallen down in a close to perfect vertical line like it did?

    Would the collapse of both buldings weaken the ground in the area that much, that a near bulding would also collapse and if so then why were there no other closer buildings collapsing in that area?

    And so on 😉

    There´s so much open questions….

    Ah, women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent. Friedrich Nietzsche

    #248903
    +1
    Russky
    Russky
    Participant
    13502

    Building 7 was a 47 story skyscraper that collapsed on 9/11 “due to office fires”
    There were no planes, barely any damage and no kerosene there.
    The video shows it. Plenty of other videos showing the same thing. Google it

    I am not surprised you never heard of it – most people didn’t
    But it is a master key to unraveling the whole charade

    Look, I don’t want to make enemies here, and I will shut up if you don’t want to hear about it. I have nothing to prove. But I tell you, that 9/11 was the biggest red pill I ever swallowed in my lifetime, so I thought some of you could be more susceptible than others to drop the propaganda and open your eyes to what happened. No offence. Just trying to help. Don’t kill the messenger

    proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

    #248907
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35354

    would´nt the part of the building that was atop of the damage tipped to the side, into that direction of the damage?

    Only if the building was designed by idiots. The WTC towers were not. They were designed to fail in the exact manner that they did.

    Building 7 was a 47 story skyscraper that collapsed on 9/11 “due to office fires”

    Wait, that’s supposed to be video of building 7?

    It’s not even the right color.

    And it still looks like tempered glass failure to me.

    #248912
    +1
    Russky
    Russky
    Participant
    13502

    This reminds me of arguing with a married blue piller about women
    I rest my case. Let’s agree to disagree, You know I love you sidecar. Let’s put our differences aside
    At least now you know about WTC#7 controversy. It’s a start

    proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

    #248927
    +1
    CPT Obvious
    CPT Obvious
    Participant
    2155

    Let’s agree to disagree. You know I love you sidecar. Let’s put our differences aside

    Best post of the thread.

    "You don't know a woman till you have met her in divorce court."
    #248933
    Wallstreet
    Wallstreet
    Participant
    63

    Oh god, 9/11 truth…

    Fire does not have to melt steel. That is a fallacy. Steel weakens as it heats up. Get it hot enough and the load on it will cause it to fail, ask any fire protection engineer. Ask any black smith!

    If anyone knows what sectional density is, figure the sectional density of a loaded Boeing 767/757 and it is very nearly equivelant to an AP round fired by a battleship!

    The floor trusses were bolted to the core and perimeter columns. Bolted! The perimeter columns were made of quarter-inch steel plate welded to form a hollow box column. They were joined vertically by bolts! The sheer strength of bolts is not that high, I have seen wood expand and cause bolts to break! And it is quarter-inch steel, fairly sure several hundred pounds travelling at a few hundred miles per hour would sheer that steel.

    Concrete was not used in the building except as flooring.

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 73 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.