- 2015-03-18 at 5:47 AM#31863+2
So here we have it, full circle in a series of articles I have been exposed to through many years in this game.
And here is the final installment, from all places, Sweden. Fembot central. The hive mind nerve center. Home of the first feminist army (1) (I like calling it VULVA the “Victoryless Uterine Ladies Voluntary Army”). Vulva’s first mission was to detect and destroy a enemy Russian Sub:
There is a measure of the surreal to these developments and Sweden’s response to them. When in October Swedish forces hunted what was all but certainly a Russian submarine in the Stockholm archipelago, Swedish media dispatched reporters into dinghies, where they breathlessly tried to intuit news in the movement of naval vessels. And when Sverker Göranson, the supreme commander of Sweden’s armed forces, went before the media last month to present concrete evidence that a submarine had violated his country’s territorial waters, a Russian newspaper responded by calling the officer “unmanly.”
(1) Margot Wallström, the newly minted foreign minister, has said that under her leadership Sweden will become the only country in the world to conduct a “feminist foreign policy.” That’s a perspective that flows from U.N. Security Council Resolution 1325, a landmark measure that recognized both the disproportionate impact war has on women and the role women must play in ensuring peace and security.
So the feminists are gearing up for eventual war with men. Vladamer Putin, arguably the only openly heterosexual male in politics today, is the Swedish Jimmy Cho Shoe division’s first mission. Like with Julian Assanage, the battle plan involves getting him to sleep with two Swedish girls and have them both accuse him of sitting with his legs spread, manspreading, in the Kremlin and he in his punishment he will be sent to the Russian embassy in Sweden where he lives in fear of having his dick cut off by angry crowd of fans of the View.
But fearless and endlessly creative men have come to the for to defend men’s access to ever depreciating worthless pussy.
Home | Sci/Tech | Science:
Science: Why Biological Women Could be Superseded in Future
STOCKHOLM – Sweden – The rise of feminism and misandry amongst today’s women could be the advent of a future with no biological women left, a team of scientific thinkers and technologists revealed on Sunday.
“In effect, widespread misandry, the hatred of men, is a catalyst for the complete breakdown of biological and societal forces that govern humanity.
Through our detailed analysis we see a severe split between the sexes, especially in the developed world, where women reject the male, thus sealing their own doom.
“Technological advances in artificial intelligence, in creating near biological androids, and in bio-engineering through nano-technology will in the next twenty years create females who are ideal partners to biological males.
“These entities will be engineered with tailored personalities to their specific partners, and through artificial intelligence will be adaptive and compliant to the male they serve.
“Over time, because of feminism and misandry, biological women will be superseded and removed from the evolutionary pool, although some may still exist in small pockets in lesser developed nations. Feminism is thus a tool for population control that can be utilised to halt biological breeding.
“The severe fractures in today’s societies are due to the active role of feminism in undermining and destroying families worldwide, and those who promote transhumanist doctrines are perfectly happy to continue with feminism, a Marxist Soviet doctrine to enact change.
“Women used to be the glue that held societies together, but now they are defunct under feminism, and in the future the biological female will be a rarity. Low birth rates, abortion and feminism are the anti-thesis of nature’s biology, and science will soon have a fix with the next evolutionary step during the epoch of AI.”
OR2015-03-18 at 1:37 PM#31961+2
This isn’t the first time Sweden has used a feminist foreign policy. In WW2 they let Norway, Denmark, and Russia do the fighting while they stayed at home knitting tea cozies.2015-03-18 at 2:56 PM#31983+3
There is nothing more damaging to the vast majority of men than the patriarchy and white knight/chivalrous men. These men are extremely naive, ignorant and self-serving. Men in power will gladly throw the majority of men under the bus to gain favor with the gynocracy, to keep their jobs (get re-elected) and to maintain the status quo (see ‘1 in 5’ and ‘yes means yes’).
When it was asked for, the patriarchy gave women the right to vote, the right to higher education and the right to work. Unless they sign up for selective service, men still don’t have many of the rights women are granted by default. Initially, men had to enlist and fight in war to have the rights women were freely given – by the patriarchy.
I have never seen a movement so overflowing with hypocrisy, double standards and sexism than feminism. Take ‘yes means yes’ for example. To feminists, this is a good law. What’s more, the law is based entirely on bogus, debunked rape statistics. It’s no surprise that the patriarchy agrees with the ‘yes means yes’ law. The president of the United States, the patriarch of all patriarchs, personally endorsed and pushed ‘yes means yes’ into being.
Alimony, child support and default maternal custody are constructs of the patriarchy and constructs of a time when women could not support themselves financially. This is American patriarchy. Men made these rules, which have, through divorce, destroyed countless millions of men’s lives. Though feminists did milk it for all it was worth, the patriarchy made men the disposable gender, not feminists.
It was mandated by society that men be providers and protectors of their families, just like women were mandated by society to be homemakers and caregivers. It was mandated that men go to war and sacrifice their lives for women and children. Those men that refused were branded cowards, imprisoned and ostracized socially and financially. Men and women that didn’t play ball were demonized by both patriarchs and matriarchs. In the past, for a man to get a decent job, he had to be married with kids. To some degree, this social rule still exists today – enforced by both the patriarchy and the matriarchy.
The patriarchal structure was designed to benefit women and those men at the top – and to make the majority of men disposable. This is how we arrived at male-only selective service and the male only draft. Feminists distort the real truth when they paint all men as evil oppressors. Why do they still do it? Because it’s served them well for many, many decades. Now, as things are backfiring, you can smell the desperation. The patriarchy and gynocracy are seeing the err in their ways. Naive white knights and misandric feminists are getting their just due.
The single most misandric institution of our time is marriage. Men give all of their power over to their wives when they marry, which is why men should never marry. It is the patriarchy that gave women this power over men though marriage, not feminists. If you look deeply into the agendas of major women’s groups, you’ll find them fighting to hold onto this anti-male power.
What men really need to understand is that both the patriarchy and feminism are working against the vast majority of men; hence the debunked rape, wage and domestic violence statistics. That feminists and many of the most powerful male world leaders continue to run with the deeply flawed statistics tells you everything you need to know about their agenda. Why do they keep using the debunked wage, rape and DV stats? Men are now and have always been the disposable gender. This fact has never been more clear than today. The powerful, cowardly, white knights of the patriarchy will continue to throw men under the bus to appease the gynocracy. You can see this playing out right now before your eyes.
Our future is Sweden’s present. High out of wedlock births, low marriage rate, low indigenous birth rate, mass immigration, feminist movie censors, males made to pee sitting down, the redefinition of speech against feminism as hate speech, sky high taxes and misandric government leaders. Our future leaders will be split between feminists and their cowardly white knight lap dogs.
Expect to see more and more policies and laws that shift men’s assets over to women in the relatively near future. Of course, these policies won’t be called “Bachelor Taxes” outright. Instead, men’s wealth will be shifted under the guise of equality and fairness, with a clear bias against men and in favor of women. If you look carefully, many such laws and policies are now/have been in place for decades.
It seems to me that feminism is about forcing men, through misandric law, to give women whatever they want. Feminism is a narrative based on the idea that whatever was positively associated with men and traditional western society ought to be destroyed. Feminism is the idea that men are full-fledged villains who ought to be defeated, shamed and then either forgotten or hated. Feminism is the idea that whatever men accomplished they accomplished on the backs of women and that men should therefore be dispossessed and reviled.
At one point in time, feminism may have matched the dictionary definition so often quoted. Today, feminism represents the epitome of sexism, hypocrisy, misandry and double standards. The phrase “Destroy the Patriarchy” means “dispossess from men power and property and hand it over to women.” This is “equality of outcome”. This is socialism, which is what feminism is really all about. Just ignore the fact that, when you drive down the road, everything you see about you was always and is now built by men.2015-03-18 at 3:06 PM#31985+1
2015-03-18 at 3:11 PM#31986+1
- a system of society or government in which the father or eldest male is head of the family and descent is traced through the male line.
- a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.
- a society or community organized on patriarchal lines.plural noun: patriarchiesThe definition of patriarchy has been lost in the sands of time, it’s been molested beyond description, more like “PATRI-ACHY”.
In a nutshell, any kind of “-ism”, be it racism, sexism, fascism, or feminism is promotion of your particular flavor of person/creed/cause over all others, and its often taken to the extent of being hate speech. Half of what the feminists spew from their mouth now is on par with the racists, Muslim terrorists and other extremist groups out there. If those groups were in a public forum, at a rally or such, they’d be jeered and have heavy objects thrown at their heads. Why is it that roughly 50% of the population of the world can be the target of a small, vocal minority made from the other 50% and it NOT be labeled hate speech?2015-03-18 at 8:55 PM#32069
In a nutshell, any kind of “-ism”, be it racism, sexism, fascism, or feminism is promotion of your particular flavor of person/creed/cause over all others, and its often taken to the extent of being hate speech. Half of what the feminists spew from their mouth now is on par with the racists, Muslim terrorists and other extremist groups out there. If those groups were in a public forum, at a rally or such, they’d be jeered and have heavy objects thrown at their heads. Why is it that roughly 50% of the population of the world can be the target of a small, vocal minority made from the other 50% and it NOT be labeled hate speech?
Well, It has nothing to do with trying to right anything(that’s just a facade), but it has everything to do with trying to demolish everything, in this case the civilization, society, values and system that they hate.2015-03-21 at 5:34 PM#32918
“That’s a perspective that flows from U.N. Security Council Resolution 1325, a landmark measure that recognized both the disproportionate impact war has on women and the role women must play in ensuring peace and security.”
What is this horses~~~? Disproportionate impact? What, like staying home and not f~~~ing dying on the front line after you did not get drafted?
The UN is f~~~ed. No wonder so many women want to work for them. Then they wheeled out Emma Watson with her bulls~~~. Because you know, she was “oppressed” when see was eight years old for being called “bossy”
Gimme a f~~~ing break.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.