Requested YouTube video ID jt119oLej6Q does not exist.


VIEWS 26,872

Welcome to our MGTOW women’s studies class. Lesson number one. Are you sitting comfortably? Let’s begin.

For those who have (or have not) heard of Briffault’s Law or claim to have never seen it in practice, here is the very personification of what is otherwise affectionately known as “The Rosetta Stone of Female Behavior” – backed up by female testimony – with textbook accuracy. When she can no longer collect a benefit, no association with the male takes place.

Women call this “rinsing”.

While we – as men – cannot begin to comprehend the idea that everything you do amounts to nothing, we are more baffled by the population of suckers in the world who continue put out for women who don’t. We’re not talking about springing for a lunch or treating her to a coffee, here. These cucked “males” have such a low opinion of themselves, they believe her time is more valuable than his – even when he brings infinitely more to the table.

The male/female exchange of sex for resources has been around since the beginning of time, and prostitution is going on in every restaurant tonight… but even that’s not a commensurate exchange. In a sex-for-sex arrangement, she’s getting laid too, but in this case, not even that is happening. He buys her a handbag, and if he doesn’t buy her another one next week, she’s looking for another idiot who will. Until her looks fade. Then it’s game over, and she will have to do more at the office than gab on IM and play solitaire all day.

For formerly attractive women, that’s hell.

Sex is the entire biological point between men and women. A $300 bottle of Crystal just so she will talk to you – is not. It’s up to every modern man to insist the female is good for something other than ordering in restaurants and spending your money.

Briffault’s Law (by Robert Briffault – c.early 1900’s)

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family.
Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.

There are a few corollaries I would add:

1. Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.

This is to say that the amount of energy, investment, time and attention a man invests in the female is totally irrelevant to her. What you did for her yesterday, simply doesn’t count. The flow of expected gifts, favors, unearned adoration, attention and time must continue (and even escalate), else there is no point in knowing you.

2. Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)

Furthermore, what you do for her today – through some mutual spoken (or unspoken) understanding – is valueless and amounts to nothing as soon as you provide it. This would be like buying stock in a company and waking up tomorrow with the shares valued at $0.

3. A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).

Self explanatory. But incase you’re still upside down after reading that, it essentially translates to: “she doesn’t give a rat f~~~ ass about you”.

Here endeth the lesson. For your homework, you will keep your wallet closed. Class dismissed.